So, your boy Michael Vick cops a plea, and its looking like he gets some jail time. Sexy. PETA vegans everywhere can start fellating themselves in joy while staving off the hunger pangs. Fantastic. Let's all have a beer at Jim Mora's house.
If you're a weenie internet site or a talking head show on a sports network, you're asking the hypothetical question regarding whether or not Vick will ever play football again. Salacious. Edgy. Topical. And pretty silly because there's about a 971,024% chance he gets signed to play football for some NFL team the second he steps out of jail with all four limbs intact. Thanks for wasting your own time and bandwidth.
The only hypothetical question I want an answer to is this:
What's the next retarded crime that 1000's of people commit every day that some athlete is going to get screwed for doing?
And I'm not saying dog-fighting shouldn't be illegal. (Insert canned disclaimer about how vile, etc. it is, and blah blah, you don't fucking care, blah) I'm saying... people have dog fights. People gamble. People use steroids. People hide their weed in stupid places when they travel through airports. I gamble - hell, I'm about to gamble with some cats this weekend. Suck it, Johnny Law. My wife used to hide her weed in a coffee can. People do these things. Let's not act like it's new, you fancy-assed high horse riders. Get over yourselves.
So, with Bonds done raping Henry Aaron's corpse, Tim Donaghy singing like an American Idol contestant, and with Vick going to jail to spread herpes like strawberry jam on toast, the media's going to need a new "we hate him" guy tomorrow. I'm taking three guesses.
Jaywalking:
It's a longshot, for sure. I mean, you can jaywalk live on the evening news standing next to a cop and still not get in trouble for it. But what if Peyton Manning gets caught jaywalking in downtown Boston? Does he get written up for it by some homer cop jackass? Does it make the news? Does he have to give a press conference apologizing to the city of Indianapolis for being a jaywalking maverick? Does Roger Goodell suspend him for a game if he's convicted? I'm truly curious about this. If for no other reason than to see athletes being forced to hold hands and cross only at the corners for a few months afterward.
Downloading Some Stolen Music:
Of the (and I'm guessing at the number here) jillions of people that steal crap music every day, what are the odds that none of them are pro athletes? I'd say (and I'm guessing at the number here) zero. So, who's getting rung up by the industry for it and being forced to apologize to the artist for stealing their 8 cents of royalty? Is Ichiro going to get in trouble for downloading a Boredoms album? How does Carmelo Anthony feel about Klymaxx? I honestly think this one could actually happen, and I hope that Metallica gets all shitty and indignant, then refuses to ever let the team they play for rock "Enter Sandman" over the PA system again.
Stealing Cable:
I'm not saying you're doing it now, but if you haven't stolen cable at some point in your lifetime, you lose. Cable is expensive for no reason, and being able to marvel at how much more funny Reno 911 is when you realize its free is everyone's god given right. And, despite athletes being (and I'm guessing at the number here) jillionaires, they know a good deal when they see it. Slip the cable guy a $50 and a tip about your co-worker's bad hip, and they're good with Showtime for life. So, who gets caught for this? Sidney Crosby? I'd giggle my ass off.
This was a retarded post. But, look - my point is valid. Somebody's going to go down for some shit that we do all the time. I'm just hoping that whoever it is plays for some team that I hate. Yeah.
How can you tell someone is a screw up? When the only defense someone can give you is "other people break laws too."
Posted by: Nominal Me | August 20, 2007 at 08:23 PM
I like the transition from the underground world of fighting and executing dogs to gambling and getting caught with an eight of dope. Not enough O's in smooth.
I bet Carmelo is a huge fan of Klymaxx.
Assman, aren't you like 27? How do you remember shit like Klymaxx from when you were in Kindegarten?
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 20, 2007 at 10:11 PM
"...there's about a 971,024% chance he gets signed to play football for some NFL team the second he steps out of jail with all four limbs intact."
I've gone back and forth between that viewpoint and the "no one will touch him" viewpoint. I think I've finally settled on the not likely making it back to the NFL extreme for a few reasons.
(1)People like dogs. They like them more than they like humans. Whoever picks him up has to deal with a ton of complaints from citizens and animal rights groups.
(2) The most reasonable scenario right now, Vick misses the 07 and 08 seasons and looks to come back in 09. That's a long time to be out of the game, especially for someone playing quarterback.
(3) And this is the one that really makes a difference: I can see this turning out differently if Vick were a great player. He's not. He's exciting, but he isn't a good quarterback. Having him running your team is not a significant upgrade over whomever he would be replacing.
Then again, we seem to all like to completely ignore that Jamal Lewis had to do time for attempting to distribute cocaine, so what do I know.
Back to your main point, sure people who are more famous are going to get taken down for things that most people would get away with, because they are used to set an example for everyone else. That's why Martha Stewart went down for insider trading when what she did was relatively minor compared to many other people. That's why Vick's co-defendants started getting plea deals to give more information. It's bigger news to get the bigger star. It's not fair, but these people are still being held to the law, not to a second set of rules.
The difference between gambling, steroids, jaywalking, illegal downloads, stealing cable, etc. and dog fighting is that one smacks seriously of sociopathy. Again, so do things like spousal abuse, assault, rape, etc., and we seem to be ok with athletes performing those at times.
Posted by: Craig | August 20, 2007 at 10:27 PM
"And pretty silly because there's about a 971,024% chance he gets signed to play football for some NFL team the second he steps out of jail with all four limbs intact."
And there's a 971,204% chance that "some NFL team" will be the Raiders.
Posted by: Jack Klompus | August 20, 2007 at 10:53 PM
Vandelay,
I had radio in Kindergarten. Klymaxx was on it. So there.
Craig,
In a world where Ray Lewis is playing football, Qyntel Woods is walking free and Ricky Williams is carrying pot in his pocket right now, I have a hard time believing that 2 years isn't enough time for tempers to cool enough for someone to get Vick as a 2nd string QB. Everyone gets a second chance when they sell tickets. Celebrity is stupid and Americans love football. He'll be back.
Posted by: Assman | August 20, 2007 at 10:56 PM
Klompus,
I wasn't going to say anything, but... well, yeah.
Posted by: Assman | August 20, 2007 at 10:58 PM
Vick will be back. He will fill seats and as much as winning that drives decisions in professional sports. I dispute that he was not a great QB. He was somewhere along the development curve to being a faster Steve Young with better arm. Steve Young himself thought as much.
The real issue is will he be like Ali or Tyson after the break. Physically and psychologically neither were the same after his hiatus.
I am sad for what he did and disgusted. I am also sad that some redneck will generalize that all black athletes are criminals and cite this example. I am sad that this same person will view this as a victory.
I am also sad that the African-American community turned a blind eye to the evidence and automatically assumed he was being railroaded. Many have been screwed by the criminal justice system throughout America's history, but not many wealthy athletes in the 21st Century. OJ was in the 20th century but still deserves mention. Jason Williams killed a his dog and his driver and walked. Pac Man Jones is a free man still regardless of the facts of the case. Kobe had sex with a white girl who alleged rape in Colorado. Michael Jackson beat all sorts of weird shit. Whether you like it or not, we have come a long way baby, as far a black men with resources are concerned.
What will all those who blindly supported Vick say niow. I would love a post that addresses that. Michael Vick, you broke my heart.
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 21, 2007 at 07:31 AM
Michael Jackson is black?
Posted by: jackie | August 21, 2007 at 08:38 AM
He was . .
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 21, 2007 at 08:44 AM
"Michael Jackson is black?"
When it's convenient.
Posted by: lattalayne | August 21, 2007 at 08:46 AM
Then again, we seem to all like to completely ignore that Jamal Lewis had to do time for attempting to distribute cocaine, so what do I know.
Well he spent like 3 months in a halfway house conveniently set up so that he wouldn't miss any football. Ed Garland is a fucking genius.
Craig, the premise of your argument makes no sense to me. Famous people have money. That money gives them special treatment in 90% of criminal cases. That's the bottom line.
I am also sad that the African-American community turned a blind eye to the evidence and automatically assumed he was being railroaded. Many have been screwed by the criminal justice system throughout America's history, but not many wealthy athletes in the 21st Century. OJ was in the 20th century but still deserves mention. Jason Williams killed a his dog and his driver and walked. Pac Man Jones is a free man still regardless of the facts of the case. Kobe had sex with a white girl who alleged rape in Colorado. Michael Jackson beat all sorts of weird shit. Whether you like it or not, we have come a long way baby, as far a black men with resources are concerned.
Forgetting someone?
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 21, 2007 at 10:10 AM
"When it's convenient."
When would it be convenient for Michael Jackson?
Posted by: Jack Klompus | August 21, 2007 at 11:05 AM
Craig, the premise of your argument makes no sense to me. Famous people have money. That money gives them special treatment in 90% of criminal cases. That's the bottom line.
Which is why I included the bit about Jamal Lewis and "what do I know". I think the points I raised were valid, but in the end, being famous and rich will probably win out.
Posted by: Craig | August 21, 2007 at 12:24 PM
"When would it be convenient for Michael Jackson?"
The exact year was 2002, I believe:
(from VH1 News)
"Michael Jackson took on Sony Music chairman Tommy Mottola this past weekend, accusing the head of his record company of being a racist and part of a racist conspiracy against black artists.
Though it was anticipated that Jackson would challenge standard practices of the music industry and champion artists' rights when he spoke at the Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network in New York's Harlem neighborhood on Saturday, his personal attacks against the Sony executive came as a surprise, not least of all to Sharpton himself.
Most of Jackson's comments were constrained to the overall treatment of black artists, the struggle of whom he said he shared. The pop star compared his troubles with his record company to those of artists who struggled financially, saying that there was an "incredible injustice" taking place.
"The recording companies really, really do conspire against the artists," Jackson said. "They steal, they cheat, they do everything they can, especially [against] the black artists. ... People from James Brown to Sammy Davis Jr., some of the real pioneers that inspired me to be an entertainer, these artists are always on tour, because if they stop touring, they would go hungry. If you fight for me, you're fighting for all black people, dead and alive.""
Posted by: lattalayne | August 21, 2007 at 12:32 PM
Didn't the gloved one also get in bed with honorable minister louis and them during the whole jesus juice fiasco?
Posted by: jackie | August 21, 2007 at 12:38 PM
Yeah, Jackie, I think he may have been black that month, too.
Posted by: lattalayne | August 21, 2007 at 01:03 PM
I give up who am I forgetting?
Posted by: OCHO OCHO | August 21, 2007 at 02:04 PM
Would anyone care if Michael Jackson were eaten by camels in his now native Barhrain?
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 21, 2007 at 02:07 PM
I give up who am I forgetting?
You're dead to me.
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 21, 2007 at 02:15 PM
"You're dead to me."
Well, break out the femaldahyde for me too then.
No idea.
Posted by: jackie | August 21, 2007 at 02:54 PM
Really?
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 21, 2007 at 03:20 PM
I suppose you've all forgotten that Vandelay hates Ray Lewis more than any human being living today?
Posted by: Assman | August 21, 2007 at 03:24 PM
Right? I'm a little concerned I haven't made that clear enough now. I may need to write a new post.
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 21, 2007 at 03:36 PM
"I suppose you've all forgotten that Vandelay hates Ray Lewis more than any human being living today?"
More than Tom Brady?
Posted by: Jack Klompus | August 21, 2007 at 08:53 PM
You cant mean the Right Reverend Ray Lewis?
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 22, 2007 at 09:17 AM
More than Tom Brady?
Infinitely.
Yes Ocho...God's linebacker, himself.
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 22, 2007 at 09:43 AM
Do you hate all players from the U as well? More specifically, what did you think about the Playmaker's induction speech?
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 22, 2007 at 10:08 AM
I thought it was self-serving and contrived.
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 22, 2007 at 10:44 AM
"I thought it was self-serving and contrived."
Tough crowd.
"You don't come into the O.B. and play that stuff!!!"
Posted by: jackie | August 22, 2007 at 10:48 AM
Whether self serving/contrived or whatever. It was great speech and humbling
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 22, 2007 at 03:59 PM
Who was humbled? You?
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 22, 2007 at 04:08 PM
He lay himself bare in front of the world. I am sorry for what he did to Pittsburg in the Super Bowl.
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 22, 2007 at 04:58 PM
I don't think he did anything to them in the Super Bowl. I think he caught one first down.
So Michael Irvin can bitch and moan about being disrespected for the voters having the audacity not to think he's Canton worthy for his first two years of eligibility and then when he gets in, all of a sudden he's humbled? Give. Me. A. Fucking. Break.
Michael Irvin is a piece of shit who epitomizes everything that is wrong with the modern athlete.
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 23, 2007 at 10:05 AM
While not giving Irvin a pass. Does not the demise of the urban family and a lack of role models and community support play any role. Also the fact that these marquis athletes are coddled and rarely forced to study, work to get laid, pay for food, or otherwise adhere to the other rules of man, could also play some role.
In many ways, modern athletes are not so unlike the dogs we now pity so much. They are trained, socially conditioned and hardened. While we should expect more from them, to expect them to act like normal citizens is not relaistic either. Nothing in their experience or environment is normal.
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 23, 2007 at 10:51 AM
Has anyone spoken to or heard from a Vick supporter? Is the species extinct? Does anyone here support him. Just curious to see the other side of the argument expressed, if it can still be. SCLC where are you?
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 23, 2007 at 10:57 AM
In a recent article by Robert Cassidy of Newsday, Cassidy asked Roy Jones Jr his feelings on Falcons quarterback Michael Vick and his involvement in dog fighting. Jones Jr made it clear he was not a dog fighter and had never attended a dog fight. However this did not stop Jones Jr. from defending Vick and giving his views on Dog Fighting.
Quoted in Newsday, Jones Jr on the subject of Michael Vick and Dog Fighting, stated this to the publication: "People tend to talk so hard against people. They make it such a bad thing, like dog fighting is worse than killing someone."
Jones Jr added: "I'm not a dog fighter. I've never been to a dog fight. But just because they have the animals doesn't mean they are fighting the animals. Michael Vick doesn't have that kind of time to train and raise dogs... I like bulldogs and I like their mentally."
Jones Jr concluded: "They are making this so bad, but really two dogs fighting can happen in anyone's backyard or on the street. It happened in my backyard, two of my dogs fought and one died."
Also quoted in the Green Valley News, Jones Jr stated: “Fighting animals don’t necessarily get mistreated. They get treated just the way I get treated."
Roy Jones Jr is set to face off against Tito Triniad in his next fight.
Posted by: jackie | August 23, 2007 at 11:36 AM
Another guy on my "ex fan of" list. Damn
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 23, 2007 at 11:54 AM
Isn't Roy a cockfighter?
Posted by: Art Vandelay | August 23, 2007 at 11:59 AM
Jones posed with one of his fightin' chickens in SI a few years ago.
Posted by: Ned Isakof | August 23, 2007 at 12:24 PM
From Bloomberg:
to return to headlines. EquityN H
VICK FILES PLEA AGREEMENT; ADMITS TO KILLING DOGS Page 1/2
Washington (dpa) - Michael Vick, the star quarterback of the
Atlanta Falcons, filed his plea agreement on Friday, admitting to
conspiring in a dog fighting ring and to killing underperforming dogs,
US sports media reported.
Vick, 27, is to formally plea in a federal court in Virginia on
Monday, but his sentencing will not take place for several months,
ESPN television reported.
While Vick admitted to financially supporting dogfights, he denied
having ever gambled on their outcomes, a key move that will weigh in
heavily as to whether the National Football League (NFL) will allow
him to resume playing once he has served out his sentence.
Vick is already likely to be suspended by the league once he is out
of prison, but if the NFL determines he was involved in illegal
gambling the suspension could be much longer.
Vick will not be playing in the upcoming American football season
set to begin in September.
As part of the agreement, federal prosecutors recommended that the
judge sentence Vick to a minimal prison time ranging from 12 to 18
months. The maximum would have been five years.
Vick has been one of the NFL's dynamic stars and among its most
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 24, 2007 at 03:46 PM
Was feeling the man's apology. Was not reading, seemed legitimately contrite, but then he went with the Jesus stuff and lost a brutha.
Posted by: jackie | August 28, 2007 at 09:08 AM
Vick related predictions:
1) Gonna get more time than everyone expects. Says like 3 years here. Judge is hard ass and owns dog.
2) Joey Harrington is going to have a pleasantly surprising big year and work out wonderfully for the Falcons.
Posted by: jackie | August 28, 2007 at 09:20 AM
Did anyone else get the sneaking suspicion that Vick was not readying, but it was rehearsed? I've got nothing to base that on other than my overall suspcious nature and general loathing for the "Gee, I'm sorry" press conferences. The only way I think they're genuine is when they happen before you get caught.
Totally different note: did anyone see the story about Idaho GOP Senator Craig getting busted for pulling a George Michael in the Minnie airport? Too funny for words, especially the part about trying to bully his way out of an arrest by flashing his Senator business card to the arresting officer. Rommney had recently praised Craig for this "strong conservative values". You can't make this stuff up.
Posted by: TMan | August 28, 2007 at 10:19 AM
Sorry, typo. First sentence should say "not reading" instead of "not readying".
Posted by: TMan | August 28, 2007 at 10:21 AM
Joey H looked pretty good last night, I thought.
I dunno how much time Vick's going to get, but the apology was definitely pre-fab. He started with "I've always been an athlete, not a speaker" to come off humble. Rolled into "I've got to grow up" to sound as though he's erady for change. And threw in the Jesus because he knows that means automatic forgiveness from everybody that caers about that kind of thing.
With that said, what else was he going to do? He was supposed to be prepared. It'd be reckless not to be.
Posted by: Assman | August 28, 2007 at 11:07 AM
They best line was that he "rejects" dog fighting. After six years? I mean really. I want to see whom he implicates. Michael Vick is a criminal but he is not the Kingpin of the $400MM/year dog fighting business. Many a pro athlete and common criminal must be nervous.
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 28, 2007 at 11:44 AM
I thought the TMQ on ESPN gave a pretty good "defense" (i.e. not saying dog fighting is okay, but did not crucify him either)
I agree. I think dog fighting is sick; but he didn't kill anyone. This movement to humanize animals is sick, though. People with their "babies"
Posted by: M. Butler | August 28, 2007 at 03:14 PM
yes and no. While I think we should distinguish between people and animals, I also think people have a choice to fight, most of the time. Killing a person is worse than killing a dog. Buying a slave and fighting it and killing the loser is more analogous to dog fighting
Posted by: Ocho Ocho | August 28, 2007 at 04:03 PM
Couple thoughts;
1.) I thought his apology was genuine. There was a line in Menace 2 society when Charles dutton was talking to Tyrin Turner (Kane) about his son Sharif being a muslim and him being christion and that he didn't have a problem with it because "if Allah can make my son a better man than Jesus can, then I'm all for it". Basically I'm saying I have no problem with him evoking JC. If that's the route he chooses for self improvment then so be it. The end will hopefully be the same.
2.) Theys just some damn dogs man. And not nice dogs either, hell two of 'em entered a womans house in the early morning in Gig Harbor, Washington, through her cat door or whatever, and mauled this lady in her damn sleep. She woke up and tried to shoot 'em but missed and was able to escape to her car, lock herself in and call 911. I didn't even have to hear what kind of dogs they were when I first read the story, of course it was a Pit. Let's not act like Vick was fighting Cocker Spaniels here please. I don't see the analogy about fighting and killing between dogs and humans that 88 is tryin to make, slave or not.
3.) I'm not buyin' Joey Harringtons' PRESEASON!! performance one bit. The dude has been garbage from jump. Sure he's played for some sh*tty teams but still, his mechanics and all that have just looked atrocious. Harrington definatly doesn't throw as hard as Vick though, so those recievers might actually hold on to the damn ball.
Posted by: Esco | August 28, 2007 at 08:45 PM
I'm a little surprised at the variety of responses here. I guess it's true what they say, opinions are like a-holes... everyone's got one, and nobody wants to hear yours. So here are some facts, rather than opinions.
1) Dog fighting is illegal in Virginia
2) Dog fighting is a federal crime
3) Michael Vick has plead guilty to federal dogfighting conspiracy charges
Now my opinions...
Just because you don't often hear about someone going down for a crime, doesn't mean it's not happening every day. The Vick case was about as high profile as they come, and his status is the reason we are talking about this, not because it's some BS law. If you think dogfighting should be legal, or decriminalized, then do something about it. At the very least, stand up and say that. Don't say "Somebody's going to go down for some shit that we do all the time", because "we" don't. Hell, someone gets busted every 25 seconds in this country for drugs. How many thousands of women are raped every day? Just because an act is (relatively) common does not make it okay, and in the case of dogfighting, it is neither. I hope Vick is a good little snitch and helps bust 100+ others involved in this "sport". It doesn't disgust me, it isn't that I think it's vile or evil. It's simply this, we have decided in this country that it is an illegal act, and those violating that act, if convicted, are criminals.
Posted by: John | December 21, 2007 at 05:32 PM